The early mountain bikes are now sought after, especially the higher end machines. I put a GT Karokoram Elite on Craiglist and within an hour or two several people wanted to come buy it. I had no idea. Could an old mountain bike be better than a newer one?
I currently have two mountain bikes- the first is the GT from 1992 or so, it has a 7-speed freewheel and early shifters that have a single knob. It has uncomplicated cantilever brakes and a U-brake booster on the rear wheel. Lots of stopping power. My newer mountain bike is a specialized FSR XC, full suspension. I bought that one in 1999 or so. I cannot ride the Specialized because the rear shock won't hold gas any longer and I didn't want to spend $200 to replace the FOX vanilla shock. Additionally, the Specialized has rapid fire shifters, where each shifter has two buttons and up and a down. These shifters don't work any more, they only shift through half of the gear range. I am sure the shop will tell me that these can't be serviced. So maybe the newer mountain bike needs $350 of work. Meanwhile the older GT still rides!
It is interesting to go to Walmart, Costco or other mega stores where they sell bikes and see the cheaper mountain bikes... 24 or 27 speeds, full suspension and all junk. The average customer at Walmart, who does not know bikes, would think that more gears is better, and more suspension is better. But the bike industry is doing the value minded customer a disservice, by not offering a stripped down bike, much like my early 1990s GT- for a lower price. Now that would be progress.
Doug I have a 1999 fsr xc got the rouche racing (sp) shock 5 yrs ago no priobs whatrsoever
ReplyDelete